MCWP 3-31 — Magtf Fires And Effects

MCWP 3-31 governs fires and effects doctrine in Marine air-ground task force operations, including lethal and nonlethal effects.

Search MCWP 3-31

  • Publication number: MCWP 3-31
  • Title: MAGTF FIRES AND EFFECTS
  • Date: 17 May 2024
  • Proponent: 03000 Operations & Readiness
  • Status: Current

View MCWP 3-31 on armypubs.army.mil


It addresses MAGTF capabilities, fires and information activities, and the roles and responsibilities of the fires and effects coordination center. Its methodology provides a systematic approach to planning, integrating, executing, and assessing fires and information activities.

Applies to: It applies to all Fleet Marine Forces (FMF), but its focus is at the Marine expeditionary force level.

Topics covered

  • MAGTF fires and effects doctrine
  • Fires and effects coordination center
  • MAGTF fires and effects integration methodology
  • Relevant actor analysis
  • Dynamic targeting guidance
  • Air apportionment and allocation
  • Countering air and missile threats
  • Combat assessment and battle damage assessment

Questions and answers

What does MCWP 3-31 require for fires and effects battle rhythm activities?

The battle rhythm should be sequenced with a logical flow of inputs and outputs between events that ultimately support command decision requirements. (paragraph 3)

How should targeting and other working group outputs be handled?

In general, targeting, air coordination, information, and collections working group outputs are integrated and synchronized at the fires and effects working group and briefed at the fires and effects board for decision. (paragraph 3)

What should dynamic targeting guidance not be limited to?

Dynamic targeting guidance should not be limited to a prioritized list of target types and categories. (paragraph 5-3)

How are entities not assessed as valid military targets handled?

Per CJCSI 3370.01, entities or objects not assessed as valid military targets are not placed on target lists. (paragraph 4-7)

What information should the separate relevant actor list include?

The format of this list should include the relevant actor’s name, location, desired effect(s), engagement capability, assessment metrics, etc. (paragraph 4-7)

Ask Reggie.Bot a question about MCWP 3-31